Geopolitics and the British Empire: Halford Mackinder’s Liberal Imperialism

0
2414

The disciplinary roots of International Relations are being topic to postcolonial inquiry. One mental determine who requires such scrutiny is Halford John Mackinder, a founding father of geopolitics. Mackinder’s concepts, now over a century outdated, nonetheless retain affect. Perhaps most notably, it was his 1904 paper ‘The Geographical Pivot of History’ about the strategic significance of Eurasia that was keenly cited by hawks defending the United States’ occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq. Like them, Mackinder additionally held imperial ambitions. His life’s work was devoted to renewing the British Empire, which he feared can be overtaken by rival continental powers. True to his perception in the praxis of geographical data and territorial statecraft, Mackinder additionally sought a profession in politics. The first indicators of this transition had been in 1900 when he stood in the common election for a largely forgotten faction of the Liberal Party, the self-defined Liberal Imperialists. The story of his electoral misadventure helps illuminate the ideological context during which geopolitics emerged and the functions to which it was put.

Mackinder started the new century as a person on the up. On 22 January 1900 he arrived triumphantly at the Royal Geographical Society to lecture on his ascent of Mount Kenya. Not solely was he the first European to achieve the summit, however the first to current his findings to the Society utilizing color images. With its mixture of nationwide status and scientific development, the expedition fleshed out Mackinder’s popularity as a pioneering geographer. At this level he was recognized primarily for his scholarly contributions as principal of Reading College and reader at the Oxford School of Geography, each not too long ago established thanks largely to his endeavours. During the spring he travelled round the nation giving lectures on Mount Kenya and on 3 October – common election polling day – he was as a consequence of deal with incoming college students at Reading Town Hall and obtain scholarship purposes for Oxford. But with simply two weeks to go he tossed these plans apart and determined to face for election himself in the midlands constituency of Warwick and Leamington.

The sudden choice was curious. Mackinder had no political sponsor at the moment and no connection to the constituency save for some University Extension programs he had given at Leamington Town Hall a decade prior. It is feasible that he was advocate to the native Liberal Association by J. Saxon Mills, a former grasp of Leamington College and their first option to be candidate. Mills would have recognized of Mackinder from the University Extension motion and held comparable views to him on questions of empire. But why enter the race so late? Maybe Mackinder sought distraction. Whilst receiving public adulation for his exploits in East Africa, in his personal life he was going by means of a painful separation from his spouse. All we all know for sure is that the day he obtained the supply from the Liberal Association in Leamington, he instantly telegraphed again and set off to satisfy them that night.

The common election of 1900 was a khaki election, so-called as a result of it was dominated by army questions over the British annexation of the unbiased Boer states. Mackinder was unequivocal on this concern. He supported the Boer War and believed that any pacifist or anti-imperial sentiment needed to be put apart in order that Britain might stay a pressure for freedom. Keen to impress his place on the Liberal Association, Mackinder informed them:

If we valued our British liberties we have to be ready to defend these liberties when the event arose, not solely in opposition to small powers, however in opposition to nice world powers, nearly as nice as ourselves. Therefore…it was inconceivable in such an age, no matter may be our needs, to stay little Englanders. He was a Liberal Imperialist, however didn’t imagine all wars had been proper, for conflict was a catastrophe at any time – (hear, hear) – however he can be no social gathering to the omission of something which ought to render it much less straightforward for them to worth their British liberties or to retain the energy of extending these liberties.

This was a message he repeated all through his marketing campaign, urging the want for Britain to guard itself in opposition to the quickly growing powers of Germany and the US by means of imperial federation with (white) Australia, Canada and South Africa: ‘a league of democracies, defended by a united Navy and an efficient army’. His bullish stance and famend oratory evidently nervous the opposition, a lot in order that the Unionist massive gun Joseph Chamberlain made journeys to Warwick and Leamington on the eve of the election to talk in favour of the incumbent. After introductory remarks during which Mackinder was branded a ‘mongrel’ as a consequence of his indefinable political breed, Chamberlain then ridiculed his misplaced allegiance, declaring that: ‘the only fault I find with Mr Mackinder is that he is not a member of our party… I hope that after this election he may see fit to join the Liberal Unionists’.

Newspaper picture © The British Library Board. All rights reserved. Used with permission. With because of The British Newspaper Archive.

In the occasion, Mackinder’s case for Liberal Imperialism didn’t persuade the citizens. Despite lacking the complete election on authorities enterprise in South Africa, his opponent Alfred Lyttelton elevated his majority and gained with 59 per cent of the vote. Somewhat conceitedly, Mackinder put this defeat all the way down to poor organisation by the native Liberal Association, reminding them: ‘elections were not won by public meetings, however enthusiastic, or else they would have won’. Still, the Association recorded their thanks and noticed him off with a refrain of ‘He’s a jolly good fellow’.

But Mackinder wasn’t completed but. Three years later a by-election was referred to as as Lyttelton had been promoted to Colonial Secretary and needed to recontest his seat. The promotion got here following the resignation of Joseph Chamberlain, who had controversially stop the cupboard to marketing campaign for tariff reform. Mackinder was in full settlement with Chamberlain’s want to make the British Empire a protected commerce bloc. He joined the Tariff Reform League, and, fulfilling Chamberlain’s earlier hope, did certainly change to the Unionists. He even supplied to go to Leamington to talk in favour of his former opponent, which was, in his phrases, ‘the only manly course for me to adopt’. The response at the city’s Liberal Club was to take their picture of Mackinder down off the wall, shoot it to items, and burn what was left.Mackinder was suggested to not journey to the city.

At least Lyttelton appreciated the supply. The following 12 months, as Colonial Secretary, he presided over Mackinder’s illustrated lecture on the British Empire, which was meant to be used in faculties to domesticate patriotic imperial topics. The mission would come to fruition in the textbooks ready for the Visual Instruction Committee of the Colonial Office, which Lyttelton inspired colonial governors to undertake. The relationship between the two males was cemented at the 1906 common election when Mackinder once more supplied to talk for Lyttelton, in addition to for Arthur Steel-Maitland, one other tariff reformer, who was campaigning in the close by Rugby constituency. This time the supply was taken up, however once more it went down badly. As reported in the London Daily News, when Mackinder rose to talk at a public assembly in a Leamington faculty:

…it was the sign for a scene of deafening uproar, above which rose cries of “Mongrel”. He stood for 5 minutes smiling considerably sardonically, and then, asking for a blackboard, wrote in chalk, “Be fair, as Englishman”. Again, taking his place on the platform, Mr Mackinder stood patiently awaiting a chance, which by no means got here, to handle the electors.

Undeterred, the two continued with their joint platform and the following day Mackinder made a prolonged speech in help of the Unionist place on tariff reform, which he described as ‘a life and death matter for the country’. Particular effort was made to discredit the Liberal Party declare that protectionist tariffs would result in greater meals costs, which Mackinder thought may very well be prevented by harnessing ‘the vast fields of Canada’ as a assured provider of low cost grain. The voters once more disagreed and Lyttelton misplaced his seat in the Liberal landslide that swept apart the Conservative and Unionist alliance.

Mackinder lastly made it into Parliament in 1910 as a Conservative and Unionist MP for the Glasgow constituency of Camlachie however by the early-Nineteen Twenties stop social gathering politics fully for a technocratic function chairing the Imperial Shipping Committee. He had turn into cautious of the menace posed by consultant democracy to professional rule and social order; a direct response to what he noticed as the socialist indoctrination of employees by the Labour Party, however maybe additionally a lingering bitterness to these first ego-bruising experiences in Warwick and Leamington. He additionally felt that in parliament he had performed justice neither to his expertise nor his trigger, having by no means been introduced into the inner-circle of presidency. At the finish of his life he voiced remorse that he ‘did not stick to Geography alone’. Maybe issues would have turned out in another way had he not rushed into politics, particularly for a celebration he would later flip his again on. But then once more, whoever heard of a cautious imperialist?

Further Reading on E-International Relations

Source: httpspercent3Apercent2Fpercent2Fwww.e-ir.infopercent2F2021percent2F03percent2F21percent2Fgeopolitics-and-the-british-empire-halford-mackinders-liberal-imperialismpercent2F